January 31, 2023
Annapolis, US 36 F

Pantelides nominates controversial City Manager

Thomas C. Andrews, nominee for Annapolis City Manager. (Photo:  WXIA-TV Atlanta>
Thomas C. Andrews, nominee for Annapolis City Manager. UP(Photo: WXIA-TV Atlanta

UPDATE: Eye On Annapolis spoke to Tom Andrews this evening and he offered his explanation of the circumstances surrounding the lawsuit in Georgia. You can read that information here

NOTE:  Some of the dates in the original article were inaccurate and some areas needed clarification.  To make it clear, we will be striking out incorrect info and adding clarification in red.  The Mayor’s office is sending us some additional information and we will reach out to Mr. Andrews for comment.

Annapolis Mayor, Mike Pantelides has nominated Thomas C. Andrews to lead the City through his administration. The City has been without a permanent City Manager since January when Pantelides fired City Manager Mike Mallinoff. Mallinoff was replaced by Assistant City Manager Virginia Burke who abruptly resigned in March. Her replacement was Brian Woodward (then Parks & Rec Director) who abruptly resigned in July. He was replaced by David Jarrell (then Public Works Director) who still holds the position.

The nominee will likely have a difficult time being confirmed by the council. Eye On Annapolis spoke to several members of the council who have immediately expressed deep concern over Andrews’ nomination. Andrews was charged and found guilty of racial discrimination and ultimately cost Fulton County nearly $1.5 million dollars in a jury verdict because of his actions.

Anne Arundel History

In 1999, Andrews was the land-use officer for the county and was embroiled in an investigation where he deviated from the law to facilitate a developer without any public input. In the end, a panel found that there was no wrong-doing, however they did state that they deviated from policy to facilitate the change.  Shortly before the decision, Andrews resigned to take a position as County Manager for Fulton County, Georgia.  (Baltimore Sun article).

In an interesting connection, the developer in the Anne Arundel case was Annapolis Developers Associates; and current Assistant City Manager Bob Agee, was a partner in that company which ultimately brought the scrutiny of the FBI and the Anne Arundel County Ethics Commission in to investigate.  In By 2005, Agee was working as the Annapolis City Administrator under Mayor Ellen Moyer. During that period, Agee was the key person in the Market House debacle.

Fulton County Lawsuit

In August of 2012, a jury found Fulton County and Andrews guilty of racial discrimination and awarded an employee $300,000 in the lawsuit.  A The jury found that a caucasian man was passed up for a promotion in 2007 based on his race because a commissioner and Andrews wanted a black woman to fill the open position. According to testimony, Andrews  referred to employees as “black marbles” and “white marbles.”  Like in Anne Arundel County, Andrews resigned the position shortly before the jury verdict was returned.

WSB-TV2 Video

Later In April of 2013, after the employee was awarded the $300,000 in 2012, a judge increased the award by an additional $1.18 million. The employee, who was white, was serving as an acting department head (in 2007) and was passed over for the position which ultimately went to a black woman who had not even interviewed for the position according to court records. The plaintiff’s position was ultimately eliminated in 2010.

According to Annapolis You can read Mayor Pantelides’ press release hereAndrews has held three positions since leaving Fulton County in 2012. (it is unclear how many positions have been held since leaving Fulton County [reportedly in 2007], we interpreted the Mayor’s release listing positions chronologically; the Mayor’s office has said that the positions were listed by rank–Federal down to local) Subsequent to leaving Fulton County in 2008, Mr. Andrews has held two positions; one as a part time instructor at Georgia State University, and another (most recently) as Senior Vice President for a municipal recruiting firm based in Florida.

[do action=”blackwall-hitch”/]

Previous Article

Annapolis mayor appoints manager, attorney

Next Article

Chesapeake Arts Center annonces 2014-15 season

You might be interested in …


  1. Hey EYE ON ANNAPOLIS….get your facts straight. Dates and points made in this article are NOT TRUE!!!!!!!

  2. the developer in the Anne Arundel case was Annapolis Developers Associates was the developer

    I can barely get past this poor sentence.

  3. Becky–

    We have made some minor corrections and are currently waiting on some more info from the City. We will also be reaching out to Mr. Andrews.

    We welcome opposing, well reasoned opinions. If you are interested, please email [email protected]

  4. The following items are incorrect in this article: 1) The 1999 Ethics complaint was dismissed and there was no decision made. 2)Regarding the Fulton County Lawsuit, the African American woman that was hired had more experience (including a Masters Degree) and qualifications than the man that held the position on an interim basis. Also, she DID interview for the position. 3) The “black marbles/white marbles” comment was NEVER made regarding employees. This statement is a complete RIDICOULOUS LIE and taken 100% out of context. 4) Tom Andrews retired from Fulton County in 2007, not 2012. 5) Since retiring Tom Andrews has acted as a consultant to a ONE recruiting company.

    Check out this article for a complete TRUTHFUL list of Tom
    Andrews’ accomplishments: https://www.eyeonannapolis.net/2014/09/18/annapolis-mayor-appoints-manager-attorney/

  5. I spoke with your father last night. The ethics complaint was not dismissed, there was a finding (after the investigation) that no wrongdoing was done, but it was irregular. The lawsuit in Fulton County made the allegations about the woman not being interviewed. You father disputes that. However, the jury and a judge felt there was enough evidence to support a verdict and award. Your father did tell me he used that phrase and that it was taken out of context. However, again, when presented in trial, it was enough to convince a jury and judge that it was relevant. There is an additional article published late last night based on that conversation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *