<------
1-14-22 to 3-8-22 <------
-- October 21 - 1-14-22 <---------
Orioles Bud april 2020 to Sept 2020
“Nationals October 2019

When Lawyers Attack

| October 31, 2010, 11:35 AM | 5 Comments

It is bad enough when you are on the wrong side of an attorney, but when you get a group of attorneys all battling it out, it is reminiscent of a Mike Vick dogfight.

What this fight boils down to is that one lawyer ran against another lawyer in a primary election and won–and the losing lawyer is now worried and calling in favors from other lawyers to mount a smear campaign against the lawyer who won. Got that? Now, if we could only get all of those lawyers together to go “fishing” with Tom Capano….

In one corner you have Alison Asti who has sent the attached cease and desist letter to her opponents. In the other corner, it seems that every trial and family lawyer that is somehow beholden to the sitting judges slate is taking jabs–and large advertisements and sending out a lot of mailers and robocalls.

This will get very interesting. Will Asti win? If she doesn’t, will she follow through with her threats and file suit? Wow, imagine a lawyer suing a lawyer and going before a judge to get a judge’s seat. And what happens to the two seats if the election is contested? Do they remain vacant?  It seems there are a lot of unanswered questions when lawyers attack.

All of these political dirty tricks sort of make a good argument for changing the process.

Tags: , ,

Category: NEWS

About the Author - EOA Staff

Eye On Annapolis is a community based site focusing strictly on Anne Arundel County. These staff postings are general news postings made by our team of bloggers throughout the day and are not attributed to any one particular staff person.

Connect with the Author

Author's Website Facebook Twitter YouTube rss feed

Comments (5)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Margeret Brent says:

    Wow–do you do this for all of your advertisers?

  2. Margeret Brent says:

    I just noticed in the letter from her attorney that she was paid $400,000 for doing nothing. Are you kidding me?

  3. John Frenaye says:

    Ms Brent, Esq.?–no need to be an advertiser. We have been critical about the witch hunt for Leopold who did not advertise.

  4. John Frenaye says:

    It seems that that was a buyout of a contract. Pretty standard stuff in the business world. Very similar to the $42,000 paid to the MSA predecessor.

  5. Margeret Brent says:

    The buyout was similar to the $42,000 buy out for the predecessor that the state auditors found she was at fault for paying — but almost ten times as much.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.