County Executive Leopold Opts Out Of Jury Trial

| January 17, 2013
Share
Anne Arundel County Executive John R. Leopold

Anne Arundel County Executive John R. Leopold

County Executive John R. Leopold has changed his decision for a jury trial and opted to have retired Circuit Court Judge Dennis M. Sweeney decide his fate in his criminal misconduct trial.  This comes after a day spent questioning potential jurors who were all dismissed today.

For a defendant, there is risk in both types of trials.  Juries can be fickle, unpredictable, and emotional. It was quite probable that a jury trial could have resulted in a hung jury and a dismissal or re-trial of the case, further prolonging the legal battle.

In theory, a judge should be able to remove most of the emotion from a trial and rule on the facts and the evidence. But they are certainly not without opinion.

Judge Sweeney presided over the trial of former Baltimore Mayor Sheila Dixon and offered some closing remarks before sealing the Mayor’s fate.  Included in those remarks was this comment:

The agreement allows the City of Baltimore to move forward from this painful and dispiriting episode and avoids what would have certainly been months if not years of continuing litigation and appeals that would have prolonged the agony for all involved and prevented the important business of the City and its people from being dealt with in the best fashion.

Former Mayor Sheila Dixon settled her case with a plea bargain that included probation, community service, restitution, and ultimately the resignation of her office.  It can be argued that Leopold’s alleged crimes do not compare.

Is Judge Sweeney inclined to rule more favorably towards Leopold because he wants the County to move forward and past the issue?  He indicated that there were months, if not years, of appeals in the future for Baltimore which seemed to leave a bad taste in his mouth. Will his opinion be similar here in Anne Arundel County?

Opening arguments are scheduled to begin on Friday.

Leopold’s Other Woes

Leopold is also facing several civil suits surrounding allegations from a former employee that he allowed for a hostile workplace and sexual discrimination among other allegations. While the outcome of this criminal trial will not necessarily affect those cases, a not-guilty verdict would put a damper on them.

The ACLU and Carl Snowden are also suing the County Executive alleging that he maintained dossiers on political “enemies” for political gain. A not-guilty verdict or a dismissal in the criminal case would likely resolve that one as well.

Many Appeals Likely

Since Leopols is in the “fight of his life,” a guilty verdict, or a ruling on behalf of the plaintiff in the civil cases, will most likely result in several appeals to the decision which will likely outlive Leopold’s political life as he prepares to leave office in 2014. In terms of the costs of these trials, Leopold has agreed to refund the County the cost of defense of his civil cases if there is an unfavorable verdict, but until such a time, the embattled County Executive is working with an open taxpayer-funded checkbook.

The other day, we posed a poll asking our readers what they thought the outcome would be–55% said guilty, 30% said not-guilty. Now with this new information, has your opinion changed? Please take a look and vote!

We welcome your comments!

Share

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Category: Anne Arundel County Crime, Breaking News, Crime News, Local News, Local Politics, NEWS, POLITICAL NEWS

About the Author ()

Eye On Annapolis is a community based site focusing strictly on Anne Arundel County. These staff postings are general news postings made by our team of bloggers throughout the day and are not attributed to any one particular staff person.
  • LeopoldSchmeopold

    What a douche. I hope this dirtbag gets what is coming to him, and he didn’t opt out of the jury trial because he is drinking buddies with the judge.

    Hopefully, the county will be rid of such a self-servicing pr1ck like him soon enough.

    Dooooooouuuuuuuuuuuuccccccccccccchhhhhhhhhhhhheeeeeeeee

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Raejean-Imler-French/1565114209 Raejean Imler French

    Now think about this, really. Whether Judge Sweeney would be able to give anyone in this County the opportunity to move on would be entirely predicated on Leopold being willing to accept a negotiated plea bargain. In other words, admit he was guilty. Don’t hold your breath on that one. Also, any new evidence or potential witnesses coming to light in this case will arguably assist in the prosecution of the federal discrimination charges, although an acquittal will strengthen his “wrongfully accused victim” image and tend to undermine all accusers. Regarding the ACLU lawsuit, I’m not as certain as you that finding him innocent under state law of a crime in unauthorized access to the criminal data bases will equate to finding him innocent of the same or similar crime or a civil rights law at the federal level!