Comments on: Cop Shoots Dog In Park, Police Are OK With It http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/2010/08/03/cop-shoots-dog-in-park-police-are-ok-with-it/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=cop-shoots-dog-in-park-police-are-ok-with-it ...it's about the quality of life! Tue, 22 May 2012 19:22:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Ed http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/2010/08/03/cop-shoots-dog-in-park-police-are-ok-with-it/comment-page-1/#comment-5961 Ed Fri, 13 Aug 2010 14:58:31 +0000 http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/?p=11231#comment-5961 So this guy really thought the Husky was going to kill his dog,then his wife and then him !? I think this man is looking for a job with Michael Vick ! So this guy really thought the Husky was going to kill his dog,then his wife and then him !?
I think this man is looking for a job with Michael Vick !

]]> By: monica good http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/2010/08/03/cop-shoots-dog-in-park-police-are-ok-with-it/comment-page-1/#comment-5951 monica good Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:18:48 +0000 http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/?p=11231#comment-5951 Brennan, did you get your facts straight yet? There were no injuries to the other dog, or his owners. About the shooting....we aren't talking about someone entering private property forcefully and unwelcomed with the intention of harm. Two words: PUBLIC. PARK. Brennan,
did you get your facts straight yet?
There were no injuries to the other dog, or his owners.
About the shooting….we aren’t talking about someone entering private property forcefully and unwelcomed with the intention of harm. Two words: PUBLIC. PARK.

]]> By: julz http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/2010/08/03/cop-shoots-dog-in-park-police-are-ok-with-it/comment-page-1/#comment-5906 julz Tue, 10 Aug 2010 01:21:42 +0000 http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/?p=11231#comment-5906 The cop was off duty! He should act like any other civilian would in this situation... without a gun! I don't think that shooting a dog is listed in the Dog Park Rules as a way to settle any incidents that may occur in the park. I'd rather have a vet bill for a dog bite than a dead dog. The cop was off duty! He should act like any other civilian would in this situation… without a gun! I don’t think that shooting a dog is listed in the Dog Park Rules as a way to settle any incidents that may occur in the park. I’d rather have a vet bill for a dog bite than a dead dog.

]]> By: Barbara http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/2010/08/03/cop-shoots-dog-in-park-police-are-ok-with-it/comment-page-1/#comment-5901 Barbara Tue, 10 Aug 2010 00:02:58 +0000 http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/?p=11231#comment-5901 I may pretty opinionated, and I may even admit to a big mouth.. but a narrow mind Mr/Ms.BCPD is not one of things that I am. The facts the way I have read them so far, are that the dog was shot for no damn good reason! The shephard, the cop, nor the cops wife had any scratches, bites, bruises or other marks to indicate an attack by a dog. If the loose dog was coming after his dog or them and he is an a officer with little bit of sense why didn't he just go back out the gate? He had to have still been right by it.. Sorry but he is an ass... he could have taken other measures. And if he did indeed have to shoot the dog why did he have to shoot to kill it?? Surely he could shot it and stopped it without killing it..Sorry about the language but you are way off the mark! I may pretty opinionated, and I may even admit to a big mouth.. but a narrow mind Mr/Ms.BCPD is not one of things that I am. The facts the way I have read them so far, are that the dog was shot for no damn good reason! The shephard, the cop, nor the cops wife had any scratches, bites, bruises or other marks to indicate an attack by a dog. If the loose dog was coming after his dog or them and he is an a officer with little bit of sense why didn’t he just go back out the gate? He had to have still been right by it..
Sorry but he is an ass… he could have taken other measures. And if he did indeed have to shoot the dog why did he have to shoot to kill it?? Surely he could shot it and stopped it without killing it..Sorry about the language but you are way off the mark!

]]> By: John Frenaye http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/2010/08/03/cop-shoots-dog-in-park-police-are-ok-with-it/comment-page-1/#comment-5888 John Frenaye Mon, 09 Aug 2010 19:20:41 +0000 http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/?p=11231#comment-5888 THe report says that the officer CLAIMED the dog bit. Animal Control did not take a report BECAUSE there were no bite or scratch marks on either dog nor on any person. Absent that, it is not an Animal Control case, it is a police case of someone shooting a dog. THe report says that the officer CLAIMED the dog bit. Animal Control did not take a report BECAUSE there were no bite or scratch marks on either dog nor on any person. Absent that, it is not an Animal Control case, it is a police case of someone shooting a dog.

]]> By: BCPD http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/2010/08/03/cop-shoots-dog-in-park-police-are-ok-with-it/comment-page-1/#comment-5883 BCPD Mon, 09 Aug 2010 17:55:41 +0000 http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/?p=11231#comment-5883 Brennan, I saw through your message that it is not about the fact that a god was killed but that people are too quick to judge the officer. Barbara, read the report, there was reports of the dog biting in it. don't be so narrow minded and go for the jugular at every situation. Monica, We are, in fact, in the south. The Mason-Dixon line is to our North...and you are allowed to shoot a person on your property in Maryland thanks to the castle doctrine Brennan,

I saw through your message that it is not about the fact that a god was killed but that people are too quick to judge the officer.

Barbara,

read the report, there was reports of the dog biting in it. don’t be so narrow minded and go for the jugular at every situation.

Monica,

We are, in fact, in the south. The Mason-Dixon line is to our North…and you are allowed to shoot a person on your property in Maryland thanks to the castle doctrine

]]> By: Off duty LEO kills family pet « Reformed Musings http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/2010/08/03/cop-shoots-dog-in-park-police-are-ok-with-it/comment-page-1/#comment-5850 Off duty LEO kills family pet « Reformed Musings Sun, 08 Aug 2010 15:21:40 +0000 http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/?p=11231#comment-5850 [...] line did a cursory investigation (i.e., showed up at the scene) and dismissed the issue. However, public outrage caused the thin blue line to backpedal. Now even the Humane Society will be included in the current [...] [...] line did a cursory investigation (i.e., showed up at the scene) and dismissed the issue. However, public outrage caused the thin blue line to backpedal. Now even the Humane Society will be included in the current [...]

]]> By: local resident http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/2010/08/03/cop-shoots-dog-in-park-police-are-ok-with-it/comment-page-1/#comment-5803 local resident Thu, 05 Aug 2010 21:36:58 +0000 http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/?p=11231#comment-5803 NOEL: so is it possible YOUR pitbulls are the ones who have been attacking dogs in our area? NOEL:

so is it possible YOUR pitbulls are the ones who have been attacking dogs in our area?

]]> By: Barbara http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/2010/08/03/cop-shoots-dog-in-park-police-are-ok-with-it/comment-page-1/#comment-5802 Barbara Thu, 05 Aug 2010 18:42:39 +0000 http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/?p=11231#comment-5802 http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=142251502461794 http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=142251502461794

]]> By: carollann http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/2010/08/03/cop-shoots-dog-in-park-police-are-ok-with-it/comment-page-1/#comment-5797 carollann Thu, 05 Aug 2010 04:52:17 +0000 http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/?p=11231#comment-5797 unless there are more facts in this case, it's excessive force, nothing here indicated a life threatening or dangerous situation, the owner was responding to a request to secure his dog, before he could the dog was shot. doesn't indicate if dogs were engaged in fighting , too much force too soon. not to mention tarnish on reputation of a community who is pet friendly. i woudn't want to move there and take my dogs to that park for fear of something similar happening to them. Brennan there are way too many pet lovers out there who will disagree with you. and no matter what will or will not come of any legal ramifications to the officer, HE owes the dog owner an apology( even if he's found in the right, which i personally won't be able to agree with but not my call) the owner is greiveing the loss of a companion no matter what the circumstances...officer buy the man another dog! it would be the compassionate thing to do.... you still have your dog unless there are more facts in this case, it’s excessive force, nothing here indicated a life threatening or dangerous situation, the owner was responding to a request to secure his dog, before he could the dog was shot. doesn’t indicate if dogs were engaged in fighting , too much force too soon. not to mention tarnish on reputation of a community who is pet friendly. i woudn’t want to move there and take my dogs to that park for fear of something similar happening to them. Brennan there are way too many pet lovers out there who will disagree with you. and no matter what will or will not come of any legal ramifications to the officer, HE owes the dog owner an apology( even if he’s found in the right, which i personally won’t be able to agree with but not my call) the owner is greiveing the loss of a companion no matter what the circumstances…officer buy the man another dog! it would be the compassionate thing to do…. you still have your dog

]]>