Comments on: Hartley: No Racism For Democrats http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/2010/05/28/hartley-no-racism-for-democrats/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=hartley-no-racism-for-democrats ...it's about the quality of life! Tue, 22 May 2012 19:22:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Fred Shubbie® http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/2010/05/28/hartley-no-racism-for-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-4741 Fred Shubbie® Sat, 29 May 2010 00:54:34 +0000 http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/?p=7706#comment-4741 Please don't think I am a reactionary. Read my original comments when I was Reggie Schmoenberg : http://www.hometownannapolis.com/news/OPN/2009/06/14-47/Guest-Column-The-cost-of-a-diverse-Naval-Academy.html Please don’t think I am a reactionary. Read my original comments when I was Reggie Schmoenberg : http://www.hometownannapolis.com/news/OPN/2009/06/14-47/Guest-Column-The-cost-of-a-diverse-Naval-Academy.html

]]> By: Fred Shubbie® http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/2010/05/28/hartley-no-racism-for-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-4740 Fred Shubbie® Fri, 28 May 2010 22:43:44 +0000 http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/?p=7706#comment-4740 I think he is a racist. He stated that the USNA had lowered its standards in order to let more blacks in and get the free education that is normally reserved for white underachieving Senator's kids ( McCain) and children of navy officers. He suffers from an incomplete understanding of what it means to be intelligent. He hides behind his credentials and often makes seemingly innocent yet obvious racist statements when he has a book to sell. He appears to wear a cloak of invincibility but he has limited his students with his closed mind. Oh well. I think he is a racist. He stated that the USNA had lowered its standards in order to let more blacks in and get the free education that is normally reserved for white underachieving Senator’s kids ( McCain) and children of navy officers. He suffers from an incomplete understanding of what it means to be intelligent. He hides behind his credentials and often makes seemingly innocent yet obvious racist statements when he has a book to sell.

He appears to wear a cloak of invincibility but he has limited his students with his closed mind. Oh well.

]]> By: EOA Staff http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/2010/05/28/hartley-no-racism-for-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-4739 EOA Staff Fri, 28 May 2010 22:24:48 +0000 http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/?p=7706#comment-4739 The sweeping generalization was Hartley's comment about the professor being called a racist and saying that he was a "registered democrat" like there could never be a registered democrat who was racist. And then I suggested that David Duke was in face a registered democrat and being the grand master of the KKK there has to be an assumption that he was a racist. The sweeping generalization was Hartley’s comment about the professor being called a racist and saying that he was a “registered democrat” like there could never be a registered democrat who was racist. And then I suggested that David Duke was in face a registered democrat and being the grand master of the KKK there has to be an assumption that he was a racist.

]]> By: Kevin http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/2010/05/28/hartley-no-racism-for-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-4737 Kevin Fri, 28 May 2010 21:52:00 +0000 http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/?p=7706#comment-4737 Nevermind... just read a review and critique of "Annapolis Autumn" so I'll presume that the generalizations you refer to (as well as the Duke reference)were made in Fleming's book) not Hartley's article Nevermind… just read a review and critique of “Annapolis Autumn” so I’ll presume that the generalizations you refer to (as well as the Duke reference)were made in Fleming’s book) not Hartley’s article

]]> By: Kevin http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/2010/05/28/hartley-no-racism-for-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-4736 Kevin Fri, 28 May 2010 21:42:30 +0000 http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/?p=7706#comment-4736 Just curious... what were the "sweeping generalizations" made in the article, and why do you feel he's enough of a "racist" to warrant a comparison to David Duke? Just curious… what were the “sweeping generalizations” made in the article, and why do you feel he’s enough of a “racist” to warrant a comparison to David Duke?

]]>