<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Annapolis Poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/2010/04/25/annapolis-poll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/2010/04/25/annapolis-poll/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=annapolis-poll</link>
	<description>...it&#039;s about the quality of life!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 14:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Kardash</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/2010/04/25/annapolis-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-3927</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Kardash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/?p=6924#comment-3927</guid>
		<description>Amendment CA-03-10, as proposed by Ald. Finlayson does NOT require an ICMA certified &quot;city manager&quot;. It simply requires &quot;5 years of experience in public administration&quot;. As a result, someone with a Federal, State or even philanthropic background could be named to fill this important position. CA-09-09, &quot;the Cordle Amendment&quot;, DOES require &quot;8 years of experience in city management&quot;. The difference is huge. Further, no credible city manager, who is a member of the ICMA, would accept a position that is not true to the Council-Manager system, where the FULL Council, not just the Mayor, controls his/her actions. Lastly, the Finlayson Amendment is really just a name change in the present system. If you look at the existing Charter, the duties and supervision of the &quot;city administrator&quot; is almost identical to Finlayson&#039;s &quot;city manager&quot;. Adopting this bill will be no change at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amendment CA-03-10, as proposed by Ald. Finlayson does NOT require an ICMA certified &#8220;city manager&#8221;. It simply requires &#8220;5 years of experience in public administration&#8221;. As a result, someone with a Federal, State or even philanthropic background could be named to fill this important position. CA-09-09, &#8220;the Cordle Amendment&#8221;, DOES require &#8220;8 years of experience in city management&#8221;. The difference is huge. Further, no credible city manager, who is a member of the ICMA, would accept a position that is not true to the Council-Manager system, where the FULL Council, not just the Mayor, controls his/her actions. Lastly, the Finlayson Amendment is really just a name change in the present system. If you look at the existing Charter, the duties and supervision of the &#8220;city administrator&#8221; is almost identical to Finlayson&#8217;s &#8220;city manager&#8221;. Adopting this bill will be no change at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Bowling</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/2010/04/25/annapolis-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-3922</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Bowling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 04:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/?p=6924#comment-3922</guid>
		<description>As currently written, CA-09-09 originally sponsored by Alderman Dave Cordle (R-5) is the only of the three Charter Amendments that offers real and substantive change for Annapolis and its future.  

Critics point to the financial train wreck that this Administration inherited, the refreshing leadership and tone that Mayor Cohen has brought to City Hall since his Administration took office in early December 2009.  They also proclaim that Mayor Cohen should be given a chance to continue his vision and show that his leadership will bring the City back to what Annapolitans expect and deserve. .  

There is no doubt that Mayor Cohen inherited a financial train wreck and has made tremendous progress at City Hall, has shown extraordinary leadership in making some tough decisions that were long overdue in the process of beginning to downsizing our City Government and its vastly over inflated budget which still has a projected structural deficit of $13+ Million.  The Mayor is correct in citing that while City revenues are indisputably down, City expenses is where much of the problem exists.

During this year’s budget meetings, the City’s Finance Committee asked for help from professional auditors, and outside professionals to advise it on the proper questions and items to be focused on.  A City Manager under the Council-Manager form of government as outlined in CA-09-09 would provide them this expert advice without the additional cost of outside consultants.

In concluding CA-09-09 is not about the failures of the Moyer Administration, or the early successes of the Cohen Administration, nor the far reaching possibilities of the next Administration; it is about what is best for our City and its long term management and stability.  It is never good practice to design legislation that is based on an individual and/or their performance.

I support CA-09-09 and the Council-Manager form of Government, because it is what’s best for Annapolis and its future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As currently written, CA-09-09 originally sponsored by Alderman Dave Cordle (R-5) is the only of the three Charter Amendments that offers real and substantive change for Annapolis and its future.  </p>
<p>Critics point to the financial train wreck that this Administration inherited, the refreshing leadership and tone that Mayor Cohen has brought to City Hall since his Administration took office in early December 2009.  They also proclaim that Mayor Cohen should be given a chance to continue his vision and show that his leadership will bring the City back to what Annapolitans expect and deserve. .  </p>
<p>There is no doubt that Mayor Cohen inherited a financial train wreck and has made tremendous progress at City Hall, has shown extraordinary leadership in making some tough decisions that were long overdue in the process of beginning to downsizing our City Government and its vastly over inflated budget which still has a projected structural deficit of $13+ Million.  The Mayor is correct in citing that while City revenues are indisputably down, City expenses is where much of the problem exists.</p>
<p>During this year’s budget meetings, the City’s Finance Committee asked for help from professional auditors, and outside professionals to advise it on the proper questions and items to be focused on.  A City Manager under the Council-Manager form of government as outlined in CA-09-09 would provide them this expert advice without the additional cost of outside consultants.</p>
<p>In concluding CA-09-09 is not about the failures of the Moyer Administration, or the early successes of the Cohen Administration, nor the far reaching possibilities of the next Administration; it is about what is best for our City and its long term management and stability.  It is never good practice to design legislation that is based on an individual and/or their performance.</p>
<p>I support CA-09-09 and the Council-Manager form of Government, because it is what’s best for Annapolis and its future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: molly smith</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/2010/04/25/annapolis-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-3912</link>
		<dc:creator>molly smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 17:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/?p=6924#comment-3912</guid>
		<description>I disagree with the above comment. Josh and Smith are a doing a very difficult job. Thinning a bureaucracy fed by 8 years of steroids is not an easy task. These &quot;programs&quot; have been hyped by their creators but where is the result? I might add, that with the exception of Josh, EACH author of the other proposed ammendments were &quot;at the helm&quot; driving us into this typhoon with great bravado. There is quite a culture shift going on (at least I hope)from NO suppervision &quot;do what ever you want&quot; to &quot;what are we doing and what are the results?&quot; I think that Smith is ready, willing and most importantly ABLE to cut through the smoke and mirrors downtown with deliberate and thoughtful care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with the above comment. Josh and Smith are a doing a very difficult job. Thinning a bureaucracy fed by 8 years of steroids is not an easy task. These &#8220;programs&#8221; have been hyped by their creators but where is the result? I might add, that with the exception of Josh, EACH author of the other proposed ammendments were &#8220;at the helm&#8221; driving us into this typhoon with great bravado. There is quite a culture shift going on (at least I hope)from NO suppervision &#8220;do what ever you want&#8221; to &#8220;what are we doing and what are the results?&#8221; I think that Smith is ready, willing and most importantly ABLE to cut through the smoke and mirrors downtown with deliberate and thoughtful care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/2010/04/25/annapolis-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-3911</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 15:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/?p=6924#comment-3911</guid>
		<description>so far Cohen has done nothing great for our city but create a mess on top of a mess with the help of Smith</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so far Cohen has done nothing great for our city but create a mess on top of a mess with the help of Smith</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

